add expr_open_lc and expr_subst_open lemmas

This commit is contained in:
Michael Sippel 2024-09-22 13:37:49 +02:00
parent 080aa0ffec
commit 3d200e141e

View file

@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
From Coq Require Import Lists.List.
Import ListNotations.
Require Import Atom.
Require Import Metatheory.
Require Import FSetNotin.
@ -103,7 +105,7 @@ Lemma type_open_lc_core : forall (τ:type_DeBruijn) i (σ1:type_DeBruijn) j (σ2
{i ~tt~> σ1} τ = {j ~tt~> σ2} ({i ~tt~> σ1} τ) ->
({j ~tt~> σ2} τ) = τ
.
Proof with eauto*.
Proof.
induction τ;
intros i σ1 j σ2 Neq H;
simpl in *;
@ -181,3 +183,95 @@ Proof.
reflexivity.
trivial.
Qed.
Lemma expr_open_lc_core : forall (t:expr_DeBruijn) i (s1:expr_DeBruijn) j (s2:expr_DeBruijn),
i <> j ->
{i ~ee~> s1} t = {j ~ee~> s2} ({i ~ee~> s1} t) ->
({j ~ee~> s2} t) = t
.
Proof.
induction t;
intros i s1 j s2 Neq H;
simpl in *;
inversion H;
f_equal; eauto.
(* bound var *)
- simpl in *.
destruct (j === n).
destruct (i === n).
3:reflexivity.
rewrite e,e0 in Neq.
contradiction Neq.
reflexivity.
rewrite H,e.
simpl.
destruct (n===n).
reflexivity.
contradict n1.
reflexivity.
Qed.
(*
* opening is idempotent on locally closed expressions
*)
Lemma expr_open_lc : forall k s t,
expr_lc t ->
({ k ~ee~> s } t) = t
.
Proof.
intros.
generalize dependent k.
induction H; eauto; simpl in *; intro k; f_equal; eauto.
- unfold expr_open in *.
pick fresh x for L.
apply expr_open_lc_core with (i:=0) (s1:=(ex_fvar x)) (j:=S k) (s2:=s).
discriminate.
apply eq_sym, H1.
assumption.
- unfold expr_open in *.
pick fresh x for L.
apply expr_open_lc_core with (i:=0) (s1:=(ex_fvar x)) (j:=S k) (s2:=s).
discriminate.
apply eq_sym, H1.
assumption.
Qed.
(*
* type substitution distributes over opening
*)
Lemma expr_subst_open : forall t s1 s2 x k,
expr_lc s2 ->
[x ~ee~> s2] ({k ~ee~> s1} t)
=
{k ~ee~> [x ~ee~> s2] s1} ([x ~ee~> s2] t).
Proof.
induction t;
intros; simpl; f_equal; auto.
(* free var *)
- destruct (x == a).
subst.
apply eq_sym, expr_open_lc.
assumption.
trivial.
(* bound var *)
- destruct (k === n).
reflexivity.
trivial.
Qed.