work on soundness proofs & fix bug in translate_typing

coq/soundness.v

@@ -22,9 +22,24 @@ Proof.
 
   - apply T_Let with (σ:=σ0).
     apply IHexpr_type1.
-    
     admit.
 Admitted.
+
+Lemma typing_subst : forall Γ x σ s e τ,
+  (ctx_assign x σ Γ) |- e \is τ ->
+  Γ |- s \is σ ->
+  Γ |- (expr_subst x s e) \is τ.
+Proof.
+Admitted.
+
+Lemma typing_tsubst : forall Γ α σ e τ,
+  Γ |- e \is τ ->
+  Γ |- (expr_specialize α σ e) \is (type_subst α σ τ).
+Proof.
+Admitted.
+
+
+
 Lemma map_type : forall Γ,
   Γ |- [{ %"map"% }] \is [<
        ∀"σ",∀"τ", (%"σ"% -> %"τ"%) -> [%"σ"%] -> [%"τ"%]
@@ -32,6 +47,17 @@ Lemma map_type : forall Γ,
 Proof.
 Admitted.
 
+Lemma specialized_map_type : forall Γ τ τ',
+  Γ |- [{ %"map"% # τ # τ' }] \is [<
+    (τ -> τ') -> [τ] -> [τ']
+  >].
+Proof.
+Admitted.
+
+
+
+
+(* morphism has valid typing *)
 Lemma morphism_path_solves_type : forall Γ τ τ' m,
   (translate_morphism_path Γ τ τ' m) ->
   Γ |- m \is (type_morph τ τ')
@@ -86,75 +112,100 @@ Proof.
   apply T_App with (σ':=(type_spec (type_id "Seq") τ)) (σ:=(type_spec (type_id "Seq") τ)).
   apply T_App with (σ':=(type_fun τ τ')) (σ:=(type_fun τ τ')).
 
-  set (k:=[< (%"σ"% -> %"τ"%) -> <$"Seq"$ %"σ"%> -> <$"Seq"$ %"τ"%> >]).
-  set (k1:=[< (τ -> %"τ"%) -> <$"Seq"$ τ> -> <$"Seq"$ %"τ"%> >]).
-  set (k2:=[< (τ -> τ') -> <$"Seq"$ τ> -> <$"Seq"$ τ'> >]).
-
-  set (P:=(type_subst "τ" τ' k1) = k2).
-  
-(*  apply T_TypeApp with (α:="τ"%string) (τ:=k2).*)
-(*  apply T_TypeApp with (α:="τ"%string) (τ:=(type_subst "τ" τ' k1)).*)
-(*
-  apply map_type.
-
-  apply TSubst_UnivReplace.
-  admit.
-  admit.
-
-  apply TSubst_UnivReplace.
-
-  apply T_MorphFun.
+  apply specialized_map_type.
   apply typing_weakening.
+  apply T_MorphFun.
   apply IHtranslate_morphism_path.
-  apply M_Sub, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
 
-  apply T_Var.
-  apply C_take.
-  apply M_Sub, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-  *)
-Admitted.
+  apply id_morphism_path.
+  auto using T_Var, C_take.
+  apply id_morphism_path.
+Qed.
+
+
+
 
 (* reduction step preserves well-typedness *)
 Lemma preservation : forall Γ e e' τ,
-  ~(is_value e) ->
   (Γ |- e \is τ) ->
   (e -->β e') ->
   (Γ |- e' \is τ)
 .
 Proof.
-  intros.
-  induction e.
+  intros Γ e e' τ Typ Red.
+  generalize dependent e'.
+  induction Typ; intros e' Red.
 
   (* `e` is Variable *)
-  contradict H.
-  apply V_Abs, VAbs_Var.
+  - inversion Red.
+
+  (* `e` is Let *)
+  - inversion Red.
+    subst.
+    apply typing_subst with (σ:=σ).
+    auto.
+    auto.
 
   (* `e` is Type-Abstraction *)
-  contradict H.
-  apply V_Abs, VAbs_TypAbs.
+  - inversion Red.
+    subst.
+    apply T_TypeAbs.
+    auto.
 
   (* `e` is Type-Application *)
+  - inversion Red.
     admit.
+    (*
+    apply typing_tsubst.
+    admit.
+    *)
 
-  (* `e` is Abstraction *)
-  contradict H.
-  apply V_Abs, VAbs_Abs.
+  (* `e` is abstraction *)
+  - inversion Red.
 
   (* `e` is morphism *)
-  contradict H.
-  apply V_Abs, VAbs_Morph.
+  - inversion Red.
 
   (* `e` is Application *)
-  admit.
+  - inversion Red.
 
-  (* `e` is Let-Binding *)
-  admit.
+    * apply T_App with (σ':=σ') (σ:=σ).
+      apply IHTyp1.
+      auto. auto. auto.
 
-  (* `e` is Ascension *)
+    * apply T_App with (σ':=σ') (σ:=σ).
+      auto using IHTyp2.
+      auto. auto.
+
+    * apply typing_subst with (σ:=σ').
+      subst.
       admit.
+      auto.
+
+    * apply typing_subst with (σ:=σ').
+      admit.
+      auto.
+
+  (* `e` is Morphism *)
+  - auto using T_MorphFun.
+
+  (* `e` is Ascend *)
+  - admit.
+    (*
+    apply IHexpr_type.
+    inversion Red.
+    *)
 
   (* `e` is Descension *)
+  - intros.
+    apply T_DescendImplicit with (τ:=τ).
+    auto. auto.
+
+  (* `e` is descension *)
+  - apply T_DescendImplicit with (τ:=τ).
+    apply IHTyp.
     admit.
+    auto.
 Admitted.
 
 (* translation of expression preserves typing *)
@@ -164,170 +215,46 @@ Lemma translation_preservation : forall Γ e e' τ,
   (Γ |- e' \is τ)
 .
 Proof.
-  intros.  
-  induction H0.
+  intros Γ e e' τ Typ Transl.
+  generalize dependent e'.
+  intros e' Transl.
+  induction Transl.
 
   (* e is Variable *)
-  apply H.
+  - apply H.
 
   (* e is Let-Binding *)
-  apply T_Let with (τ:=τ) (σ:=σ).
-  apply IHtranslate_typing1.
-  apply H0.
-  apply IHtranslate_typing2.
-  apply H1.
+  - apply T_Let with (τ:=τ) (σ:=σ).
+    auto. auto.
 
-  (* e is Type-Abstraction *)
-  apply T_TypeAbs.
-  apply IHtranslate_typing.
-  apply H0.
+  - auto using T_TypeAbs.
 
   (* e is Type-Application *)
+  - apply T_TypeApp.
     admit.
 
-  (* e is Abstraction *)
-  apply T_Abs.
-  apply IHtranslate_typing.
-  apply H0.
-
-  (* e is Morphism-Abstraction *)
-  apply T_MorphAbs.
-  apply IHtranslate_typing.
-  apply H0.
+  - auto using T_Abs.
+  - auto using T_MorphAbs.
 
   (* e is Application *)
-  apply T_App with (σ':=σ) (σ:=σ) (τ:=τ).
-  apply IHtranslate_typing1.
-  apply H0.
-
-  induction H3.
-
-    (* Repr-Subtype *)
-    apply T_App with (σ':=τ0) (σ:=τ0) (τ:=τ').
+  - apply T_App with (σ':=σ) (σ:=σ) (τ:=τ).
+    auto.
+    apply T_App with (σ':=σ') (σ:=σ') (τ:=σ).
     apply T_MorphFun.
-    apply T_MorphAbs.
-    apply T_Descend with (τ:=τ0).
-    apply T_Var.
-    apply C_take.
-    apply H3.
-
-    apply T_DescendImplicit with (τ:=τ0).
-    apply IHtranslate_typing2.
-    apply H1.
-    apply TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-    apply M_Sub, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-
-    (* Lifted Morphism *)
-    apply T_App with (σ':=(type_ladder σ τ0)) (σ:=(type_ladder σ τ0)) (τ:=(type_ladder σ τ')).
-    apply T_MorphFun.
-    apply T_MorphAbs.
-    apply T_Ascend with (τ:=τ').
-    apply T_App with (σ':=τ0) (σ:=τ0) (τ:=τ').
-    apply T_MorphFun.
-    apply typing_weakening.
     apply morphism_path_solves_type.
-    apply H4.
-
-    apply T_Descend with (τ:=(type_ladder σ τ0)).
-    apply T_Var.
-    apply C_take.
-
-    apply TSubRepr_Ladder, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-    apply M_Sub, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-    apply IHtranslate_typing2.
-    apply H1.
-
-    apply M_Sub, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-
-    (* argument coecrion is single function variable *)
-    apply T_App with (σ':= τ0) (σ:=τ0).
-    apply T_MorphFun.
-    apply T_Var.
-    apply H3.
-    apply IHtranslate_typing2.
-    apply H1.
-    (* lemma: every context implies identity morphism *)
-    apply M_Sub, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-
-    (* argument coecrion is chain of coercions *)
-    apply T_App with (σ':=τ0) (σ:=τ0).
-    apply T_MorphFun.
-    apply T_MorphAbs.
-    apply T_App with (σ':=τ') (σ:=τ').
-    apply T_MorphFun.
-    apply typing_weakening.
-    apply morphism_path_solves_type.
-    apply H3_0.
-    apply T_App with (σ':=τ0) (σ:=τ0).
-    apply T_MorphFun.
-    apply typing_weakening.
-    apply morphism_path_solves_type.
-    apply H3_.
-    apply T_Var.
-    apply C_take.
-    (* lemma: every context implies identity morphism *)
-    apply M_Sub, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-    (* lemma: every context implies identity morphism *)
-    apply M_Sub, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-    apply IHtranslate_typing2.
-    apply H1.
-    (* lemma: every context implies identity morphism *)
-    apply M_Sub, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-
-    (* argument coercion is is map *)
-(*
-    apply T_App with (σ':=(type_spec (type_id "Seq") τ0)) (σ:=(type_spec (type_id "Seq") τ0)).
-    apply T_MorphFun.
-    apply T_MorphAbs.
-    apply T_App with (σ':=(type_spec (type_id "Seq") τ0)) (σ:=(type_spec (type_id "Seq") τ0)).
-    apply T_App with (σ':=(type_fun τ0 τ')) (σ:=(type_fun τ0 τ')).
-    apply T_TypeApp with
-      (α:="T2"%string)
-      (e:=(expr_ty_app (expr_var "map") τ0))
-      (τ:=(type_fun
-            (type_fun τ0 τ')
-            (type_fun
-              (type_spec (type_id "Seq") τ0)
-              (type_spec (type_id "Seq") τ')))).
-
-    apply T_TypeApp with
-      (α:="T1"%string)
-      (e:=(expr_var "map"))
-      (τ:=(type_univ "T2"
-          (type_fun
-            (type_fun τ0 τ')
-            (type_fun
-              (type_spec (type_id "Seq") (type_var "T1"))
-              (type_spec (type_id "Seq") (type_var "T2")))))).
-
-    apply T_Var.
-    admit.
-
-    apply TSubst_VarReplace.
-    apply TSubst_UnivReplace.
-*)
-    admit.
-
-    (* argument coercion *)
-    apply M_Sub, TSubRepr_Refl, TEq_Refl.
-
-  (* end case `e application` *)
+    auto. auto.
+    apply id_morphism_path.
+    apply id_morphism_path.
 
   (* e is Morphism *)
-  apply T_MorphFun.
-  apply IHtranslate_typing.
-  apply H0.
+  - auto using T_MorphFun.
 
   (* e is Ascension *)
-  apply T_Ascend.
-  apply IHtranslate_typing.
-  apply H0.
+  - auto using T_Ascend.
 
   (* e is Desecension *)
-  apply T_Descend with (τ:=τ).
-  apply IHtranslate_typing.
-  apply H0.
-  apply H1.
+  - apply T_Descend with (τ:=τ).
+    auto. auto.
 Admitted.
 
 (* e is stuck when it is neither a value, nor can it be reduced *)
@@ -346,6 +273,8 @@ Lemma progress :
 Proof.
 Admitted.
 
+
+
 (* every well-typed expression is translated,
  * such that it be reduced to a value
  *)
@@ -357,20 +286,21 @@ Theorem soundness :
 .
 Proof.
   intros.
+  induction H0.
 
   (* `e` is Variable *)
-  induction H0.
-  exists (expr_var x).
+  - exists (expr_var x).
     split. apply Multi_Refl.
     split. apply V_Abs,VAbs_Var.
     apply H.
 
   (* `e` is Let-Binding *)
-  exists (expr_subst x e' t').
+  - exists (expr_subst x e' t').
     split.
     apply Multi_Step with (y:=(expr_subst x e' t')).
     apply E_Let with (x:=x) (a:=e') (e:=t').
     apply Multi_Refl.
+    admit.
 (*
   split.
   unfold expr_subst.
@@ -381,10 +311,9 @@ Proof.
   unfold expr_subst.
   apply E_Let.
   *)
-  admit.
 
   (* `e` is Type-Abstraction *)
-  exists (expr_ty_abs α e').
+  - exists (expr_ty_abs α e').
     split.
     apply Multi_Refl.
     split.
@@ -395,10 +324,10 @@ Proof.
     apply H1.
 
   (* `e` is Type-Application *)
-  admit.
+  - admit.
 
   (* `e`is Abstraction *)
-  exists (expr_abs x σ e').
+  - exists (expr_abs x σ e').
     split. apply Multi_Refl.
     split. apply V_Abs, VAbs_Abs.
     apply T_Abs.
@@ -407,7 +336,7 @@ Proof.
     apply H2.
 
   (* `e` is Morphism Abstraction *)
-  exists (expr_morph x σ e').
+  - exists (expr_morph x σ e').
     split. apply Multi_Refl.
     split. apply V_Abs, VAbs_Morph.
     apply T_MorphAbs.
@@ -416,13 +345,15 @@ Proof.
     apply H2.
 
   (* `e` is Application *)
-  admit.
-  admit.
+  - admit.
+  
+  (* `e` is morphism *)
+  - admit.
 
   (* `e` is Ascension *)
-  admit.
+  - admit.
 
   (* `e` is Descension *)
-  admit.
+  - admit.
 Admitted.
 

coq/typing.v

@@ -101,9 +101,9 @@ Inductive translate_typing : context -> expr_term -> type_term -> expr_term -> P
     (Γ |- e \is (type_univ α τ)) ->
     (translate_typing Γ e τ e') ->
     (translate_typing Γ
-      [{ e # τ }]
+      [{ e # σ }]
       (type_subst α σ τ)
-      [{ e' # τ }])
+      [{ e' # σ }])
 
   | Expand_Abs : forall Γ x σ e e' τ,
     ((ctx_assign x σ Γ) |- e \is τ) ->